Yearly Archives: 2018

Home / 2018

Canada and UK MPs Join Forces to Summon Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, who has already answered questions of the European parliament and the US Congress and the Senate, was recently summoned by British and Canadian MPs. The joint hearing of the two parliaments was convened to compel the Facebook executive to answer all the parliamentarians’ questions over the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Zuckerberg pushed to appear for another hearing

The role of the social media giant in the Cambridge Analytica scandal has been the subject ofdebate for a long time now. The Canadian and the UK parliaments decided to unite to try to force Mark Zuckerberg to answer their questions related to data privacy and misinformation.

The Commons Digital Culture united with its Canadian counterpart to hold an unusual joint hearing this past November 27th.

Previously, Zuckerberg had sent the company representatives in his place.  The House of Commons digital, culture, media and sport select committee held the hearing in Westminster; again, Zuckerberg sent a representative and did not attend, and those in charge left a seat empty.

The organizers named the hearing the “international grand committee on disinformation and fake news.” Parliamentary select committees worldwide, who have not been able to talk to Zuckerberg, were also  invited to send their representatives.

In a letter to Zuckerberg, Conservative Party MP Damian Collins said that lawmakers understand that it is not possible for the CEO to make himself available to all parliaments but they believe that Facebook users in other countries need a line of accountability to the tech company directly, via Zuckerberg. The letter, which was co-signed by the Canadian MP Bob Zimmer, further said, “We would have thought that this responsibility is something that you would want to take up. We both plan to issue final reports on this issue by the end of this December, 2018. The hearing of your evidence is now overdue, and urgent.”

The Facebook CEO cannot be forced to appear for the hearing. Canadian MP Zimmer had said they have asked the executive to appear at their committees several times and “expect him to show respect for both of our great nations by appearing at this hearing to answer for his platform’s practices.”

Zuckerberg’s failure to appear and to instead send a representative in his place angered many.  One Canadian MP told the Facebook rep, for instance, “In this room we represent over 400 million people, and to not have your CEO sit in front of us is an offense to all of them.”   Strong words, indeed.

Are Facebook’s Hate Speech Rules Better than Twitter’s?

In October, Facebook removed a video from the official account of Louis Farrakhan. Facebook said that the video, which compared Jews to termites, violated the company’s hate speech rules. Twitter, however, had not taken down the video and has said that its new policy on “dehumanizing comments” had not gone into effect yet.

Video violates our hate speech policies: Facebook

A Facebook representative told The Wrap, “The video was taken down because it violates our hate speech policies.” Louis Farrakhan, the controversial Nation of Islam leader, made his comments in Detroit at a 23rd anniversary event for the 1995 Million Man March.

Farrakhan said, “So when they talk about Farrakhan, call me a hater, call me anti-Semite. Stop it. I’m anti-Termite. I don’t know nothing about hating somebody because of their religious preference.” His comments drew applause and laughter from the audience.

In its statement to The Wrap, Facebook called those comments ‘Tier 1 hate speech’ and removed the video to show its intolerance towards such content.

In a statement to BuzzFeed, Twitter said that it would not suspend the account of Louis Farrakhan for a tweet with the video comparing Jews to termites.

In a blog post, the company defined ‘dehumanizing’ tweets as “language that treats others as less than human … Examples can include comparing groups to animals and viruses (animalistic), or reducing groups to a tool for some other purpose (mechanistic).” Though Twitter hasn’t removed the video, it does seem fairly clear that Farrakhan’s words do violate Twitter’s new policies about dehumanizing tweets.

Twitter’s new rule not in effect yet

A Twitter spokesperson said that these new rules have not taken effect yet, which is why Farrakhan’s language does not violate any extant policy. The spokesperson did not say when the new rule would go into effect or whether Farrakhan’s tweet would violate the new policy.

Similarly, earlier in June, Twitter did not remove a video clip captioned “Thoroughly and completely unmasking the Satanic Jew and the Synagogue of Satan” that Farrakhan posted.  Facebook responded to the clip by un-verifying Farrakhan’s account.

According to The New York Times, Farrakhan’s Facebook account has not been suspended, but it has received a “strike.”

Facebook Partnerships with Fact Checkers to Curb Fake News in Africa

After announcing its partnership with two third-party fact checkers in Kenya to curb the spread of fake news, Facebook has now announced a partnership with Africa Check and AFP to do the same in South Africa. The firms will work to help assess the accuracy of news spread on Facebook in both Kenya and South Africa.

How will the fact checkers work?

Africa Check is the first independent fact checking organization based in Africa, and AFP or Agence France-Presse is a popular international news organization headquartered in Paris, France.

Facebook relies on feedback from users to help find false stories, which are then passed on to fact checkers for further review. The local stories are checked by fact checkers, along with the videos and photos. If the fact checking partners find any story to be false, Facebook will show that story lower down in the News Feed. This will decrease the distribution of fake news.

Ebele Okobi, Facebook’s Public Policy Director, said that the company can reduce the future views of a piece of content by an average of 80 per cent if a public fact checker rates that content as false.

In addition to this, the tech company has started using a new tool that rates users on the basis of their trustworthiness. Facebook continues to trust its massive user base to assist it with flagging false news stories, but the company understands that people can provide false information—either intentionally or unintentionally– which is why it is starting the use of this new tool.

Protecting democracy is an arms race: Zuckerberg

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently compared protecting democracy to an arms race, and emphasized the need for both private and public sectors to work together to combat outside interference. The CEO acknowledged that Facebook was very late in discovering that foreign actors used coordinated campaigns to interfere with the 2016 United States presidential elections.

He wrote that “Free and fair elections are the heart of every democracy. During the 2016 election, we were actively looking for traditional cyberattacks, and we found them. What we didn’t find until later were foreign actors running coordinated campaigns to interfere with America’s democratic process. Since then, we’ve focused on improving our defenses and making it much harder for anyone to interfere in elections.”

As a part of its new program, the company will also show articles written by third party checkers under its Related Articles section, located below the story. People and page admins on the social network will also be notified by Facebook if they try to share a share a story that has been determined to be fake.

Facebook Partnerships with Fact Checkers to Curb the Spread of Fake News in Africa

After announcing its partnership with two third-party fact checkers in Kenya to curb the spread of fake news, Facebook has now announced a partnership with Africa Check and AFP to do the same in South Africa. The firms will work to help assess the accuracy of news spread on Facebook in both Kenya and South Africa.

How will the fact checkers work?

Africa Check is the first independent fact checking organization based in Africa, and AFP or Agence France-Presse is a popular international news organization headquartered in Paris, France.

Facebook relies on feedback from users to help find false stories, which are then passed on to fact checkers for further review. The local stories are checked by fact checkers, along with the videos and photos. If the fact checking partners find any story to be false, Facebook will show that story lower down in the News Feed. This will decrease the distribution of fake news.

Ebele Okobi, Facebook’s Public Policy Director, said that the company can reduce the future views of a piece of content by an average of 80 per cent if a public fact checker rates that content as false.

In addition to this, the tech company has started using a new tool that rates users on the basis of their trustworthiness. Facebook continues to trust its massive user base to assist it with flagging false news stories, but the company understands that people can provide false information—either intentionally or unintentionally– which is why it is starting the use of this new tool.

Protecting democracy is an arms race: Zuckerberg

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently compared protecting democracy to an arms race, and emphasized the need for both private and public sectors to work together to combat outside interference. The CEO acknowledged that Facebook was very late in discovering that foreign actors used coordinated campaigns to interfere with the 2016 United States presidential elections.

He wrote that “Free and fair elections are the heart of every democracy. During the 2016 election, we were actively looking for traditional cyberattacks, and we found them. What we didn’t find until later were foreign actors running coordinated campaigns to interfere with America’s democratic process. Since then, we’ve focused on improving our defenses and making it much harder for anyone to interfere in elections.”

As a part of its new program, the company will also show articles written by third party checkers under its Related Articles section, located below the story. People and page admins on the social network will also be notified by Facebook if they try to share a share a story that has been determined to be fake.

Twitter Investigated for Link Shortening

Privacy regulators in Ireland have started an investigation on the data Twitter collects from its URL-, or link shortening system, called t.co .

How and where did it all start?

A privacy researcher named Michael Veale – who works at University College London – asked Twitter to provide more information about the data it collects when users use its URL-shortening system. The company, however, refused to give information to the UK professor, who in turn called for quick investigative action by European privacy authorities.

The investigation request was made under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which gives EU citizens right to request any data collected on them from any company. GDPR is a comprehensive European privacy law that protects the privacy of European users and aims to give the individuals control over their data.

Under the law, business processes that manage personal data must be built and designed in such a way that they follow the principles and use the best-possible privacy settings by default, as well as provide safeguards to protect data. Additionally, data should not be available publicly without informed, explicit consent and no personal information should be processed unless it is done with a lawful basis.

Privacy researcher Veale suspected that the company gets more than the requisite information when users click on t.co links. According to Twitter, it applies its own link-shortening service (t.co) to links when users put them into tweets. This allows the company to measure the number of times a link has been clicked and helps the platform fight the spread of harmful viruses through unreliable links.

The Irish Data Protection Commission initiates a formal statutory inquiry into the link shortening

When the researcher received a negative response, he complained to the Irish DPC (Data Protection Commission), which promptly started an investigation. Veale complained in Ireland because the European operations of the company are headquartered in Dublin.

The Commission said in a letter to Veale, “The DPC has initiated a formal statutory inquiry in respect of your complaint. The inquiry will examine whether or not Twitter has discharged its obligations in connection with the subject matter of your complaint and determine whether or not any provisions of the GDPR or the [Irish Data Protection] Act have been contravened by Twitter in this respect.”

The letter further said that the new European Data Protection Board will handle the complaint as the complaint involves cross-border processing. This is the first GDPR investigation opened against Twitter. Veale, who has made a similar request for investigation against Facebook, said Twitter was recording the times the users clicked on links and the kind of devices users were using.

 

Hackers Stole Around $60 Million in Cryptocurrency Exchange Hack

Hackers recently stole cryptocurrency worth about $60 million  from Zaif, a Japanese digital currency exchange.

Hacks of cryptocurrency exchanges grab good deal of attention because the exchanges are easy targets. Through some of the most popular cryptocurrency hacks, hackers stole more than 980,000 bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies from unregulated and uninsured cryptocurrency exchanges.  The cryptocurrency was worth over $15 billion USD at current exchange rates.

Storing money on a centralized exchange is risky

This recent hack and the many previous hacks from digital currency exchanges highlight the risks of storing cryptocurrency on centralized exchanges.

Some of the major recent hacks of exchanges include:  BitGrail Exchange in February (hackers stole 17,000,000 NANO worth $195,000,000). CoinSecure Exchange in April (hackers stole over 438 BTC worth $3,300,000). Coinrail Exchange in June (hackers stole several tokens worth $40,000,000 ). And Coincheck Exchange in January (hackers stole 523,000,000 Asian crypto NEM worth $534,800,000).

Hackers previously attacked the Zaif exchange before for two hours as well.  They illegally relayed several digital currencies from its “hot wallet.”  A hot wallet is the place where all digital coins are stored at such cryptocurrency exchanges.

The news site Tech Bureau said that the Japanese exchange went offline until it could get solid information related to the damage and it could see success in its efforts to get it working again.

Zaif – a government-registered exchange

Zaif Exchange also made news earlier when it let seven customers buy Bitcoin with no Yen value. A system bug at the Japan-based exchange allowed users to obtain a theoretical $20 trillion USD worth of the cryptocurrency for free.  One user bought Bitcoin valued at 2,200 Trillion Yen and tried to cash in on it.  The company subsequently invalidated all of the transactions.

Japanese police received reports of almost 670 cases of suspected money laundering linked to digital currencies between April and December.